This is a blog on creative writing, on plays, poems and prose. My current project: White Flies, a play on Schizophrenia and the makings of a school production.
Sunday, 1 September 2013
Sending off and waiting
Scripts are sent.. well were sent about three weeks ago. Had a little trouble with the Therapist's as foreign computers and Word documents on Apple fail to play ball.
Then it was just a long, long waiting game for the most of the summer while I hoped to hear back about a date for performance.
There's yet no date and no theatre so a few things are needing to be rethought. It's not just scripts that have rewrites, but ideas and visions too.
Haven't been able to do a rehearsal schedule without a date so feeling a little unorganised and out of touch with it.
Will see what happens when the term commences...
Wednesday, 24 July 2013
Stage one: Checks
These last few, days
before I send off the scripts, (must get to B before she pops off to Spain)
have been days of final checks. Final read throughs with my mum so I was sure
to be sending off a 99% correct script, My mum seemed to think the voice was
that of a gremlin…
Having gotten Lisa, a
school councilor and previous ChildLine operator, to read through it, she
flashed up the issue of ‘content matter’. It hadn’t occurred to me that for
some this play could be disturbing and stir secreted memories.
So, it’s necessary to
run it through the correct channels at school, but not up to me to do this; I
will inform the head of Drama along with sending him the script.
One of the main reasons
this issue didn’t flash up with me is I’ve focused solely on schizophrenia,
having done all my research here. However, what I put in for a dramatic reveal,
is a far more common issue, that of abuse. There are high possibilities that
audience members will have experienced abuse themselves or known others that
have. Which is why we must tread cautiously; she did, though, say the play was
sensitive enough not to offend, so there were no changes I had to make (thank
god).
As a way to see who comes
away effected by what I will set up two charity boards and buckets, one for
domestic violence and one for schizophrenia. I think one will be a local
charity and one a national one, I’m thinking along the lines of the NSPCC.
She also gave me some
helpful information: the chair isn’t to be comfy as you want them to be
uncomfortable, this way you can tell a lot from their body position.
Stage one: Marking with a red (black) pen
Here’s where I play the
teacher, this part I do find fun. My granny told me you must never correct your
work on your computer, you must print it out! Despite being a pain if you have
35 odd pages to print, but it must be done. And I much prefer correcting in the
flesh. It was also quite exciting having the first print out copy of my very
own script.
The main thing I was
checking for was making sure things flowed, reading it out load and adding
commas where needed (I need to use more commas), changing those words that seem
pot holes to the flow.
There were also a few
paragraphs I needed to change, improving on things etc. But here I wasn’t
making big changes to whole sections.
Then I simply went
through the printed copy and online copy making sure they matched (a little
boring but gives time for another check).
Saturday, 20 July 2013
Stage one: Alterations
I hate this part the
most, it doesn’t matter what I’ve written, but I dread it. It’s where my mum and
I sit down to dissect my work. She brings up everything that doesn’t work or
I’ve made to obscure (well you know what they say: show don’t tell). I started
off this session with reminding her that anything she said I wasn’t going to
write down, and it’s funny but (no offence mummy) everything she suggests or
writes down in the notes, sticks out like a sour thumb when you read it. The
voice really is in the writer’s head.
I recently learnt that
when editors edit novels the majority of changes they make are structural and I
think this is due to the latter.
Really reading through
and scrutinizing the script has improved it dramatically, it’s a chore that
must be done. It also clarified what I already knew: areas that worked really
well and those that were just too confusing.
It’s a tense process,
I’m not going to lie, as I counter everything she brings up, but this is a good
balance. One of the main issues I found doing this is people, after listening
to it, were saying ‘this area needs work’, but that was pretty much all the
direction they gave. And without knowing what I needed to change I couldn’t
change it, most frustrating.
When we’d reached a
sticky point half way through where the things that needed changing just
weren’t taking the changes that were needed, I got colourful with my felt tips:
Here I was working out
each section in the play and what the point of that section was.
I met an amazing tutor
who told me ‘everything you write needs to have a theme and structure’:
‘Do you notice my
skeleton?’
‘No.’
‘Would you notice if it
wasn’t there?’
And you see what I mean,
so the structural element of White Flies is the secret and big reveal at the
end, the themes: people know what’s it like to have schizophrenia and working
out Jane’s trigger.
Now everything I write
revolves, links and has to be relevant to those themes. (Another example being
in my, ‘in progress’, novel the theme is: love leads to self discovery) Knowing
your theme makes a huge difference to your writing, it’s like the coat hanger
to which you hang your creations. This may not make sense now, but when your
writing and constantly thinking about your theme it makes everything so much
clearer. And means you don’t write waffle, every word, character and idea has a
purpose.
So my themes were in the
middle (dark pink); section numbers around the edge (dark, dull green);
relevance of those sections to the play (grass green) and what I needed to
change or add to those sections below (pink). The big purple scribble up the
side is the reveal and other notes just buzzing brain ideas I needed to get
down.
By the end of the
evening (midnight, when I really do write best) I had sorted my most confusing
section, changed me reveal and re-written my ending.
This has taught me that
you may think your first draft is fine and things do make sense because they do
to you, but it’s called a first draft for a reason.
I’m just worried about
how many drafts I’m going to have as I need to get the scripts to them for
their line learning.
Great idea: if you’ve
written a play then record it to your computer and plug it into your car: you
have your very own radio play for when your stuck in traffic. Or just record
yourself reading your kids favourite story!
Tuesday, 9 July 2013
Stage one: Touching up
A creative writing course in Purbeck, with the newly published author Joanna Rossiter, gave me a great amount of time to just sort my script. I had lots of little sections that I just needed to link together and put things in an order that made sense.
On the Wednesday we spent the afternoon on a very rocky sea side where Gemma, Jemima (Banks) and I decided to record the play, on Garage Band (laptops in wildlife). It worked well and the girls read it brilliantly considering it was the first time they'd seen it, Jemima should have auditioned!
Playing the recording to my mum she said there were still structural changes to make which I think I will struggle with.
The problems I'm encountering perpetuate from the fact my play is just dialogue. There's no movement or scene changes, there are only two actors and they stay the same characters throughout the 45 minutes (which I now know is 36 pages of font 12). I have to make the play interesting, dramatic and with that 'arch' but still make it as true to a therapy session as possible. It's proving a task.
I do have an underlying secret for that dramatic ending, and this secret is hinted to throughout the play; but that's the only clear structure, as the rest of the sections simply run into each other. I've tried a 'summing up' activity half way trough and have had Jane ask what there doing in the session at the start; but without really knowing what clear things need to change I'm unsure what changes to make.
At the moment I have a script and I do have a play, putting it on as it is will make a good production but I want to make it an excellent production.
(Ans just for you Gemma: Many thank to Jemima Banks)
On the Wednesday we spent the afternoon on a very rocky sea side where Gemma, Jemima (Banks) and I decided to record the play, on Garage Band (laptops in wildlife). It worked well and the girls read it brilliantly considering it was the first time they'd seen it, Jemima should have auditioned!
Playing the recording to my mum she said there were still structural changes to make which I think I will struggle with.
The problems I'm encountering perpetuate from the fact my play is just dialogue. There's no movement or scene changes, there are only two actors and they stay the same characters throughout the 45 minutes (which I now know is 36 pages of font 12). I have to make the play interesting, dramatic and with that 'arch' but still make it as true to a therapy session as possible. It's proving a task.
I do have an underlying secret for that dramatic ending, and this secret is hinted to throughout the play; but that's the only clear structure, as the rest of the sections simply run into each other. I've tried a 'summing up' activity half way trough and have had Jane ask what there doing in the session at the start; but without really knowing what clear things need to change I'm unsure what changes to make.
At the moment I have a script and I do have a play, putting it on as it is will make a good production but I want to make it an excellent production.
(Ans just for you Gemma: Many thank to Jemima Banks)
Saturday, 29 June 2013
Stage two: Auditions
Being one of the girls
that don’t ‘Shellcialise” after supper there’s a 90% chance that if you’re a
boy I really don’t know your name (not because I don’t care, but I really can’t
remember names, thanks dad). So when people actually turned up to auditions,
especially boys, I was in shock. I was also surprised because I didn’t think
any were into acting; but I was delighted, so very delighted.
I held auditions over
two days, 5-6, in the theatre. The parts up for grabs were the therapist and
the voice, as Jane the main character, I gave to Gemma Daubney (the other drama
scholar in the year). She did a marvellous job in the auditions.
Boys are funny when
they audition: you can tell they really are trying but they have to maintain
that ‘cool, I don’t care’ demeanour. It does make me laugh; but I wish they’d
audition for more school plays as they really are good.
The audition piece for them was a poem
from the play:
I am nothing
I wonder why I am
not dead
I hear the deadly
truth
I see the
destruction I cause
I want to die
I am nothing
I pretended I live
I feel worthless
I touch the hour
of death as it ticks by
I worry that death
won’t find me
I cry too much
I am nothing
I understand that
nothing will love me
I say too much,
always too much
I dream of the end
I hope for the end
I am nothing
I chose this,
as it’s one of the few chunks the voice has; but if I were to do it again I
would probably choose another section as they found it hard to read it sarcastically
and this is what I was really looking for, someone who could change the tone of
their voice and had a subtle yet domineering presence.
I wasn’t
to bothered about them getting it right away as that’s something we can work on,
but I needed to be sure they could
get it. And sure I am about Ollie, (who I’ve chosen) he said this one line and
I just though: yes, that’s it he’s got it. He also has a voice most like Gemma,
which is key to the play. But I did consider anther boy, Max, who had a much
deeper voice, but he was more of a risk and I just wasn’t sure if it would
work. So Ollie it is.
The
auditions were great fun and suddenly made everything feel so real. Having my
play read out in the theatre was so cool and I sat there making those little
director notes:
X: sounds a bit too much like
Charlie, can’t change tone of voice
Y:
really friendly, only acts when speaking, good smile, not that much presence
The girls audition piece was taken from the
roll play over making a new friend:
Therapist:
I’m afraid not, but this week another little step in this goal, I thought we’d
do some role-play. The scenario being: your library when you see me, a
stranger, reading the same book as you or just one you’ve read. I want you to
talk to me like I am a possible friend.
Jane:
(readjusting herself) Hello.
Therapist:
Hello.
For this the rules were reversed as I
sat on the stage and them in the audience (this is where they’ll actually be).
In the therapist I was looking for someone who had great presence as they wont
have that instant ‘stage presence’. They need to be calm and controlling but
friendly, as Jane has to want to talk to them. It was a lot harder to choose
then I thought and I had to re-audition people in their dorms. Most of the
girls that auditioned did something that was great and something that wasn’t,
so I had to choose whom I thought could take direction the best. In the end it
was between two and I decided finally on B because she didn’t look like she was acting and she has
great presence. Just needs to work on that smile over the summer J I
told her to practice being a therapist during family suppers (touch of
Stanislavski method acting).
I’ll be sending out the script to
everyone involved over the summer so they can get line learning!
Sunday, 23 June 2013
Stage one: Writing
Before any actors or
lights or costumes or directing comes the writing. Hard, tiresome and brain
tangling writing. At the moment I’d say the most stressful bit but I reckon
I’ll say that for every bit.
I’m not entirely sure
where the idea came from, I just remember getting very into it on my 13th
birthday weekend and buying my favourite thing to write in: a thick pad of
lined paper. Safe to say my first attempt was awful and I would not advise
trying to write a whole play by hand (Shakespeare, I commend you). My biggest issue
was, as per usual well pointed out by my mum, ‘too poetic, not real enough, no
one would say that.’ And of course she was right, it was a true disaster, I’ve
searched out an extract to show you:
Beth: You have to begin to prepare it three
days in advance. You start by making the rose broth; you must use fresh roses,
my favourite being red. Despite my best efforts I always manage to prick
myself; father told me ‘you mustn’t get blood in the broth as it will alter the
taste’. To the roses you add wine and water. Leave for twenty- four hours then
add saffron. After another twenty-four hours, a pinch of salt and your bird.
Cover and allow to infuse for a day. It’s best served with freshly baked rye.
Don’t worry a lot has
changed, for a start she’s no longer called Beth. I’m sure you can see it’s
issues, no one talks like that and no one makes bird poached in saffron and
rose. The first draft really wasn’t my finest.
Safe to say things
could only go up; but for a while White Flies remained sea level. I think it
was a number of distractions: secondary school entries, leaving school, making
new friends, boarding. The every day got the better of my writing and White
Flies was not forgotten, it just wasn’t at the forefront of my mind.
It was the long boring
prep sessions that reignited my fire for it, Sitting in your JCR (junior common
room) for an hour with nothing to do and the need to be silent, really isn’t
fun. Hating to feel I was wasting my time I cracked out my laptop and cracked
open my bottled idea.
Last term saw me get a
substantial amount done and this term to. My main time for writing being in
Junior Play rehearsals, my part being an extended member of the audience
(Shell: scum), I tell you there’s only so many times you can laugh at the same
joke. So, my problem at the moment is trying to fit all the different sections
together.
Writing a piece for an
English Prep about a twin dying (I am a happy person), saw me do some research
which adds so much depth to the writing; I realised I hadn’t done any research
on schizophrenia. To the IT room I went to print out 60 pages of information of
which I sieved through during prep.
Orange highlighter: relating to Therapist.
Blue highlighter: relating to Jane.
Yellow highlighter: general information
The idea isn’t to bombard
the play with facts but if you have that knowledge the words make much more of
a point.
At the moment I’ve
reached a sticky point; what I wrote pre-research is a lot more dramatic and
unbelievable compared with what I’m writing now. I don’t want to get rid of it
as I think the play would be interesting with some really dramatic episodes but
I do want it to be as realistic as possible.
A more theatrical
extract:
Jane: Fate.
Therapist: Indeed.
Jane: I don’t think fate will ever find me.
Therapist: And why do you say that?
Voice: Fate is blood dripping with blood, your
blood, your own blood. Like Oedipus slaughtering his father and mixing blood
with his mother creating little deathly blood drops. Drops of red sin.
Jane: I’m never going to find the right man am I?
Not while I’m like this. Not unless they’re the same as me, as crazy as I am
and then imagine the messed up kids we’d have? Talk about a mad house.
An extract
from my most recent, rehearsal, writing.
Therapist: Have you worked on those goals we set last time?
Jane: Of course.
Therapist: So what sort of steps have you tried to take?
Jane: Making a new friend is hard, I’ve tried to go to
places where friends may be but I haven’t found one.
Therapist: What sort of places?
Jane: Libraries, as I want my friends to be intelligent so
we have something to talk about, parks because people in parks are usually fit
and like the outdoors. No pubs or clubs as I don’t like them so I don’t want my
friend to.
Therapist: And what kind of person are you hoping to find
here?
Jane: The perfect friend.
I much prefer this, as although it’s a
little more realistic it’s still odd. Looks like there will have to be some
rewrites.
A boarding house and a
laptop just isn’t the place to sort my ideas so I’m waiting for that first week
in the holidays where I can get it up on a big screen and not have people
asking if they can borrow a top.
Little tip: phones are
excellent places to write things on, essays or poems as you always have the on
you and your work becomes pocket-able, though you do run the risk of looking
extremely anti-social.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)